Depending on your input, you might also want to make sure to properly
urlencode the keys and values.
There is a function in hiccup that does what you want (including
urlencoding):

https://github.com/weavejester/hiccup/blob/10c3ebe175edc80eed1a0792ec68036be47940d3/src/hiccup/page_helpers.clj#L117-123



On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Brad <b...@beaconhill.com> wrote:

> I wanted to take a Map and convert it to a string suitable for use as
> parameters in a URL. I have got it working below two different ways
> but wondered if there was a better or more idiomatic way to do this.
>
> ;; My test input map
> (def input {:a 1 :b 2 :c 3 :d 4})
>
> ;; What I'd like the input map convert into. A string that looks like
> keyword=value&keyword=value&, ....
> (def output "a=1&b=2&c=3&d=4")
>
> ;; This function converts each MapEntry to the key=value
> (defn map-entry-to-string-pair
>  "Convert a key value from a map into a string that looks like
> key=value.
> For example,
>    (def input {:a 1 :b 2 :c 3 :d 4})
>    (map-entry-to-string-pair (first input)) => \"a=1\""
>  [mapentry]
>  (str (name (first mapentry)) "=" (second mapentry)))
>
>
> ;; The following two functions build the result string. There is not
> much of a difference between them. The first uses
> ;; let to hold a variable after mapping map-entry-to-string-pair over
> the input map. The other just uses the same mapping
> ;; after converting it to a vector.
>
> (defn convert-map-to-url-string1
>  "Convert a map from keyword values to a string that consists of
> keyword=value pairs separated by &s for use in a URL
> For example,
>    (def input {:a 1 :b 2 :c 3 :d 4})
>    (convert-map-to-url-string1 input) => \"a=1&b=2&c=3&d=4\""
>  [m]
>  (let [pairs (map map-entry-to-string-pair m)]
>    (join "&" pairs)))
>
> (defn convert-map-to-url-string2
>  "Convert a map from keyword values to a string that consists of
> keyword=value pairs separated by &s for use in a URL
> For example,
>    (def input {:a 1 :b 2 :c 3 :d 4})
>    (convert-map-to-url-string2 input) => \"a=1&b=2&c=3&d=4\""
>  [m]
>  (join "&" (vec (map map-entry-to-string-pair m))))
>
>
> Is there a simpler, better way to do this?
>
> - Brad
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to