On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:03 PM, pmbauer <paul.michael.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That wasn't called for.
??
> Given Stu linked to the page (and is linked in the 1.3 release notes), it's
> reasonable to assume the permission error is merely a mistake and not some
> nefarious plot to withhold information from the Clojure community.
Did I say it was a "nefarious plot"?
The very fact that the web site is set up with a "You cannot view this
page" message dependent on your cookie-login and separate from the
low-level HTTP 403 error means that it's been set up to make some
information members-only. Whether that *particular* page on numerics
was intended to be members-only or not, the fact remains that
apparently some information there *is* intended to be members-only. It
is *that* that I am questioning.
Regardless, your "that wasn't called for" doesn't make much sense
since I merely stated a fact ("I can't think of ..."), another fact
("We're an open source project"), another fact (we don't have trade
secrets), and one more fact ("I have no problem, of course, with
..."). If someone is taking mere *facts* (two of which are about *me*)
personally then I'd say there may be a problem but the problem isn't
mine. :)
--
Protege: What is this seething mass of parentheses?!
Master: Your father's Lisp REPL. This is the language of a true
hacker. Not as clumsy or random as C++; a language for a more
civilized age.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
