Could be that I am using the wrong wording with "conflict resolution". Tim
On Jul 17, 1:53 pm, Tim Robinson <tim.blacks...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wasn't saying that MongoDB was similar in terms of master-master vs. > master-slave, I was saying MongoDB was similar in that it implements > conflict resolution rather that transactions. > > http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/Atomic+Operations > > "MongoDB supports atomic operations on single documents. MongoDB does > not support traditional locking and complex transactions for a number > of reasons:..." > > And that MongoDB implements a currency check ("Update if Current") to > resolve conflicts. > > On Jul 17, 11:04 am, Sergey Didenko <sergey.dide...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Tim, I think you mean CouchDB, which indeed is "master-master". MongoDB is > > extended "master-slave". > > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Tim Robinson > > <tim.blacks...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > MongoDB is similar, in that it supports conflict resolution, only I > > > believe you only have the option for the last write wins. MongoDB is > > > better suited to an embedded db model, that doesn't have to support > > > large datasets... so if you're OK with the last write wins model - go > > > for mongo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
