> At what point in time it realises the elements is mood in the end Yes. Probably the whole point of (finite) lazy seqs is some sort of side effect. Be it memory consumption, processing time, or other forms of side-effect. But, shouldn't map, filter, reduce and others, with its lazy-friendly behavior help us deal with the side effects in a predictable manner? Maybe reduce doesn't belong to that group, and that's why you proposed a change in contract.
> But why rely on unlikeliness when one can easily fix this? Yes, I already changed it to not depend on reduce realization order. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
