On Jul 11, 5:44 am, Sunil S Nandihalli <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>  I think a lazy version of shuffle would be a good addtion to the core. I
> tried googling for one and 
> foundhttp://ytakenaka.blogspot.com/2011/05/lazy-shuffle-clojure.htmlwhich was
> infact slower than original shuffle and was unable to reproduce the
> performance claims made there in. In fact the experiment showed that the
> lazy-shuffle was about 10 times slower (of course depends on the size of the
> collection to be shuffled).. Can somebody help me ?
>
> Thanks,
> Sunil.
I once created a lazy version of shuffle that worked on some random
access collection (such as vector) using the Fisher-Yates algorithm
that virtually swapped elements by using a map to keep track of index-
>element remappings. It seemed to work rather well if you wanted a
minority of the items in the original collection. I should try to dig
up that code...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to