On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Brian Marick <mar...@exampler.com> wrote: > I have a codebase with 2.6kloc of production code and 4.8kloc of tests, and I > feel your pain (even despite having been a Lisp programmer in the early > 80's). I'm not sure yet how to navigate the transition to 1.3 while retaining > backwards compatibility. And organizing things into namespaces is something I > still haven't figured out.
Since I mostly work with 50-100kloc projects, I think 5-10kloc projects are kinda small :) Given the compression ratio between Clojure and other languages, I have to say that I'm not very worried about dealing with 10kloc of Clojure. It was reassuring to see comments about Emacs being 3 million lines of code. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en