On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Brian Marick <mar...@exampler.com> wrote:
> I have a codebase with 2.6kloc of production code and 4.8kloc of tests, and I 
> feel your pain (even despite having been a Lisp programmer in the early 
> 80's). I'm not sure yet how to navigate the transition to 1.3 while retaining 
> backwards compatibility. And organizing things into namespaces is something I 
> still haven't figured out.
Since I mostly work with 50-100kloc projects, I think 5-10kloc
projects are kinda small :)

Given the compression ratio between Clojure and other languages, I
have to say that I'm not very worried about dealing with 10kloc of
Clojure. It was reassuring to see comments about Emacs being 3 million
lines of code.
-- 
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/

"Perfection is the enemy of the good."
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to