ah sorry for that.. But it looks like I have grown very complacent about clojure-functions doing the *"right thing"* .. my bad. Sunil.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, 10. Juni 2011 06:49:41 UTC+2 schrieb Sunil Nandihalli: > >> as long as (reversible? of-whatever-collection) is true , last is almost a >> constant time operation >> > > In theory, but not in practice. last will always be O(N) in it's current > implementation. The only fast way to get the last element is peek on a > vector or (first (rseq ...)) for collections supporting rseq. > > Sincerely > Meikel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
