On May 11, 2011, at 9:04 PM, David Nolen wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: > (defn ^String foo []) > (defn foo ^long []) > > The real problem is that first case was never actually specifying a return > type - it is a type hint on the var that happened to store an fn. The fn > itself can only return Object (<=1.2.0). > > Now fns can return Object, long, double.
Yes, I understand that, but is the differentiated placement of the hint intended to communicate that difference? I assume there's only one or two people that might know… - Chas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
