Thank you very much. On May 10, 1:32 am, Justin Kramer <jkkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > 'read' and 'read-string' are what you're looking for. They each read a > single Clojure object from an input source (PushbackReader for read, > String for read-string). > > Alternatively, something like this can read all top-level forms from a > file: > > (defn read-all > "Reads all top-level forms from f, which will be coerced by > clojure.java.io/reader into a suitable input source. Not lazy." > [f] > (with-open [pbr (java.io.PushbackReader. (clojure.java.io/reader > f))] > (doall > (take-while > #(not= ::eof %) > (repeatedly #(read pbr false ::eof)))))) > > (read-all "/some/clojure/file.clj") > => ((foo :bar) (baz)) > > Justin > > On May 9, 11:36 pm, Bill Robertson <billrobertso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > How do I actually manipulate it? I have some complicated logic that I > > would like to transform into html (or maybe xml) for display > > purposes. > > > I'm generating the Clojure code by parsing some nasty Java and > > outputting s-expressions. The Java is basic, but quite deeply > > nested. I want to generate working Clojure to demonstrate what that > > can do for us, and get this nastiness documented of course. > > > Other than going into the source files and transforming it by hand > > into a series of defs and quoted lists e.g. (def my_func '(+ 1 2)) > > How do I actually just load code w/o evaluating it? > > > I've found the pretty printer macros, seems like that might be useful > > if I wanted to statically transform the code. I found the walker, > > that looks like it might be useful in actually generating the output > > (e.g. visit things, spit out (x|ht)ml. > > > I looked at the various load functions in clojure.core. With the > > exception of load (http://clojure.github.com/clojure/clojure.core- > > api.html#clojure.core/load) they all seem to load and evaluate. Is > > load the answer or is it something I haven't found yet? > > > Once I get the code loaded, I don't think I need anything out of the > > ordinary like macros or multi-methods. I think I can just manipulate > > the lists. Does that sound correct? > > > I'm sorry if this are a stupid questions, but I've never done anything > > in Clojure of any significance, and any helpful answers you provide > > would could save me days of stumbling about. > > > Thanks!
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
