Hi again, On 14 Apr., 09:42, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What could explain the result of your tests ? (I'm really curious !) On the other hand the lazy version really just creates a simple linked list with some fast boilerplate concerning the laziness. The vectors however *are* more involved to construct. Their strength is their performance later on when actually *accessing* the elements. This is not what we do here. So maybe there is some sense in the results? However I don't understand the perfomance of the recur solution in this light. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
