On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 9:25:25 AM UTC-4, rob wrote:
>
>  One Scheme advocate I know has that suggested that it would be more 
> hygienic to have gensyms be the rule instead of the exception to the rule 
> (you could still get capture by asking to *not* gensym).  I'm not certain I 
> agree with him, because I haven't fully considered if that would add or 
> reduce complexity when trying to do things like anaphora (which is already 
> made somewhat non-idiomatic).
>

What do you mean by "anaphora" in this context?  Could you please provide an 
example in code? 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to