On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 9:25:25 AM UTC-4, rob wrote: > > One Scheme advocate I know has that suggested that it would be more > hygienic to have gensyms be the rule instead of the exception to the rule > (you could still get capture by asking to *not* gensym). I'm not certain I > agree with him, because I haven't fully considered if that would add or > reduce complexity when trying to do things like anaphora (which is already > made somewhat non-idiomatic). >
What do you mean by "anaphora" in this context? Could you please provide an example in code? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en