I presume that your tests are done in the same namespace as where the protocol is defined.
For real user code, where the "using" namespace will not be equal to the "+ protocol defining" namespace, your users will have to somehow import the + into their namespace. As long as you don't "magically" redefine clojure.core/+ 's symbol, things should be ok for your potential users, I guess. Cheers, -- Laurent 2011/4/8 Alfredo <alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com> > Thanks for your help :) > Bye > Alfredo > > On Apr 8, 3:10 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 8 Apr., 15:02, Alfredo <alfredo.dinap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I know that it's a user's choice, but I'm wondering if it's possibile > > > to offer a "+" function that it's extended to other datatypes -with or > > > without protocols - and still able to be applied to Numbers :) > > > > Yes. It is. Just provide it in your namespace. You showed already how. > > > > (ns your.library > > (:refer-clojure :rename {+ core-+}) > > (:import > > clojure.lang.IPersistentVector > > clojure.lang.ISeq)) > > > > (defprotocol Addable > > (+ [t1 t2])) > > > > (extend-protocol Addable > > String > > (+ [s1 s2] (str s1 s2)) > > IPersistentVector > > (+ [v1 v2] (into v1 v2)) > > ISeq > > (+ [s1 s2] (concat s1 s2)) > > Number > > (+ [n1 n2] (core-+ n1 n2))) > > > > This gives: > > your.library=> (+ 1 2) > > 3 > > your.library=> (+ "a" "b") > > "ab" > > your.library=> (+ [1 2] [3 4]) > > [1 2 3 4] > > your.library=> (+ (list 1 2) (list 3 4)) > > (1 2 3 4) > > > > I'm not sure it's advisable, though. I think adding numbers has > > nothing to with catenating strings. You should probably choose a name > > like append, concat or into. > > > > Sincerely > > Meikel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en