Yes. Generally push lazy-seq as high in the chain as you can (but no higher!), for that reason..
On Apr 3, 11:09 pm, Roman Sykora <4rt.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for your time and kind answers. I really enjoy reading this > group and the whole clojure community. Enough flattery ;) > > A question remains though (for now). > > Would I use > > (lazy-seq > (some > (stuff ...))) > > instead of > > (some > (stuff > (lazy-seq ...))) > > because some stuff would only be realized/executed if one uses the > resulting lazy-seq in the former case ? > > Sincerely > Roman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
