Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> writes: Hi Ken,
>>> Does the resolving function run on, or use, another thread? >> >> No, it runs in the same thread. But some functions like `vseq' in >> the example produce LazySeqs. So if LazySeq-realization computations >> are run in a different thread by default, that would explain things. > > They're not, but if the LazySeq realization is not happening until > after the scope of your with-schema-imports is exited, it would > explain a thing or two. You may need to sprinkle some doalls about. Oh, yes. That was the exact issue. But clearly forcing realization is not a good solution. Is there some better way to do what I want? Maybe my macro should expand to something like that? ((fn [] (binding [...as before...] body))) Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
