On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Baishampayan Ghose <b.gh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Minor observation, it seems you are using `proxy` to implement >>>> interfaces. Why not use `reify` instead? >>> >>> Thank you for this remark. reify would be more idiomatic, I'll change it. >>> proxy is a clojure-neo4j leftover, from which I've forked. >> >> Last I checked, proxy can extend a concrete class (as can gen-class) >> but reify (and deftype, and defrecord) cannot, so there may still be >> some use cases for proxy. > > I agree, but Jozef doesn't need to extend concrete classes in borneo, > he just has a bunch of interfaces to reify :)
OK. I was just responding with clarification in case anyone reading this thread came away with the impression that proxy was completely deprecated in favor of reify. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
