On Mar 8, 10:27 am, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Chris Perkins <chrisperkin...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> > You'll probably want to add checks for special cases, like an empty or
> > one-element sequence, too.
>
> Better yet, clojure.core should amend = so that (=) and (= x) return
> true instead of throwing an arity exception. That would make the
> behavior consistent with + and * which behave appropriately with one
> or zero arguments, and it would handle your special cases in this
> instance.

Only the zero-arity case needs to be amended:

user=> (= 1)
true
user=> (=)
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Wrong number of args (0) passed
to: core$-EQ- (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to