Aaron, Daniel, I appreciate your help with this. Yes, the problem was the package and class name collision. Daniel's solution to remove the :gen-class worked for me.
Thanks, -Earl On Mar 3, 2:47 pm, Aaron Cohen <aa...@assonance.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Solano Gomez > <cloj...@sattvik.com>wrote: > > > On Thu Mar 3 13:48 2011, Aaron Cohen wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Earl J. Wagner < > > dont.spam.e...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Well, t.core exists because in his ns declaration he included > > :gen-class. Now, this isn't necessary for compiling records. As for > > why it isn't compiling, I am not sure. I tried replicating the problem > > (albiet without Leiningen), but was unable to. > > Hmm, it's illegal to have a class name that collides with a package name, > isn't it? If :gen-class creates a class named "t.core", then you won't be > able to have a record named "t.core.TRecord", at least not in a way that > actually works consistantly. Clojure should probably prevent this from > compiling. > > For reference:https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=63668 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
