On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the context of chaining operators such as ->>, it is logical to consider > both the input and output of the function. The functions listed under the > "Seq In, Seq Out" section at http://clojure.org/sequences should all take > their seq arg last.
The conj function is listed in the "seq in, seq out" section of the cheat-sheet and doesn't. ;) But it seems to be the only one there, and cons can be used with ->> instead. > There is a ticket in JIRA for making -> and ->> more flexible, but I > couldn't trivially find it because you can't search for punctuation. Feel > free to respond with a link... I hate broken search tools that made unwarranted assumptions about what people would put in, or would search for. Some code was posted here recently for more flexible -> like macros. I posted one such. Most of them would thread through a placeholder, e.g. (-%> 3 (- 1 %) (/ % 2)) threading through %s or (--> [x 3] (- 1 x) (/ x 2)) actually specifying a symbol to thread through and the initial value in a binding-like syntax. (Both of those examples have -1 as the desired output.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
