Below are suggestions to the shortcomings you mention. I'm genuinely interested in how they don't meet your needs.
On Feb 23, 8:42 pm, David Jacobs <develo...@allthingsprogress.com> wrote: > - definitive, simple, integrated package management Leiningen and Cake? > - a better REPL experience out of the box (esp. Jline support) Slime/Emacs? I only use the REPL in very rare cases and aren't bothered by a lack of JLine. > - a simpler, more useful stack trace Slime? > - better commandline integration https://github.com/gar3thjon3s/clargon > - abstracting away Java concepts like excessive hierarchies for package > definitions (src/com/mycompany/wow/this/is/getting/long/my-library.clj) You don't have to use this convention. Personally I keep things shallow. > - better discovery for existing, well-tested libraries. You can search on http://clojars.org/. This works well for me. However, the key to well tested libraries is having people give feedback if a library breaks or is badly documented or doesn't meet their needs. Saul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
