Great, that would be nice! On Feb 18, 12:44 am, James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com> wrote: > On 17 February 2011 13:54, Zhenchao Li <cockneyke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > By the way, when deploying the project it seems compojure somehow uses > > java.rmi.server.UID if you use compojure.handler, and on app engine > > java.rmi.server.UID is not usable. I'm using ring.middleware to > > construct a proper usable handler for appengine, like this: (Almost > > the same as (site index) except that I don't use wrap-multipart, which > > probably uses that package) > > I'm working on a rewrite of wrap-multipart-params that should work on > locked down environments like Google App Engine, as well as > maintaining backward compatibility. You'll also be able to specify > custom storage backends, e.g. uploading multipart files directly to an > S3 bucket. > > When I have something usable, I'll create a thread on the Ring group > to discuss it. > > - James
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
