On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote: > because polymorphism makes code suck less, if done well.
If polymorphism is the appropriate solution, yes. But for a lot of people steeped in OO thinking, polymorphism is a bit of a hammer for every problem that looks like a nail. I don't find I need polymorphism anywhere near as often in FP code as I'm used to using in OO code (caveat: duck typing is a form of polymorphism and that is often my preferred approach even in OO, when I'm using a dynamically typed language...). -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
