On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:37 AM, GrumpyLittleTed <grumpylittle...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Part of the difference (under 1.2) is due to the (substantial) > overhead of accessing the buffer-size var on every iteration. > > I ran a quick check and using David's version of the code result > averaged 17.2ms. Just changing buffer-size to a local with using (let > [buffer-size (int 1920000)]...) the time dropped to an average 3.4ms. Yes, putting buffer-size in a let makes the performance in 1.3.0 identical to Java with long loop arithmetic. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
