Am I correct in assuming that if those allocations had been smaller (i.e. if the JVM had not run out of memory), the GC would have eventually detected the dead references and freed them once the locals went out of scope?
Bill Smith On Sunday, January 30, 2011 7:41:44 AM UTC-6, Rich Hickey wrote: > > > > (Note: I still think the JVM > GC should be able to figure out that those locals are dead references. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
