Didn't knew about scope, it looks like an interesting feature. Still
as you point this is pretty much a problem BKAC!

On Jan 8, 12:33 pm, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One goal of resource scopes [1] is to help with scoping activities at the 
> REPL. That said, I think this is a "ramping up" problem -- I rarely if ever 
> hit it anymore.
>
> Stu
>
> [1]http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Resource+Scopes
>
> > I've been doing a lot of Clojure lately and, of all thing,
> > collection's laziness coupled with a REPL is what makes me loose the
> > most time. I really love having laziness built-in by default and I'm a
> > REPL-driven development addict, but sometimes I just loose minutes (if
> > not hours) chasing imaginary bugs that in the end only were a misuse
> > of laziness at the REPL. Still, I can't think of any way of fixing
> > this problem other than writing on top of my monitor: "If it doesn't
> > make sense it's certainly because of laziness". I wonder what other
> > people think about this problem?
>
> > P.S.: While writing this I just got an idea, but I'm not really sure
> > it's a good one. Would it be wise to make the binding macro force
> > evaluation of its body? That would be the most common mistake I make.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > your first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to