On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 29.12.2010 um 19:36 schrieb Ken Wesson: > >> Who needs to muck about with the stack and recur when you've got laziness? :) > > Even then you have to take care, because stacking lazy seq on lazy seq on … > might also result in a stackoverflow.
True, but it's far less common to have lazy operations like maps nested 100,000 deep than it is to have seqs 100,000 items long. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
