On Dec 22, 1:03 pm, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > (Foo.) is a Java method call determined at compile-time. If you change the > definition of the Foo type/record, create-foo will be out of date. Default > constructor fns could alleviate this but I think some design/modularity > issues need to be hashed out.
Yes, I've realized this when developing this project. At first, it was less modular and I encountered much more of such issues. I also used `immigrate` previously and that was causing troubles not only with protocols, but with multimethods also. In the end there still appears to be some problems while developing protocol based code in a REPL- driven fashion. I was hoping I did something wrong that somebody could point out. P.S.: It makes me wonder if there's some improvements that can be done to make that type of coding more REPL friendly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
