On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote: > thanks Meikel for your clarification.. I used to think loop recur almost > removed the need for TCO .. but here is a case where true TCO could be > really helpfull..
If we had a (resolve-method multi & args) that resolved dispatch and then returned a fn that would call the method with those same args -- so ((resolve-method multi & args)) <=> (multi & args) -- then this could be used with trampoline in cases like Sunil is describing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
