On Dec 15, 6:12 am, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > One thing I've argued for in the past, but got no traction: > We have: > get-in, get > assoc-in, assoc > update-in, ? > Let's add update to go with update-in.
update should really be in there. I always try to write update then i remember that I have to use update-in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
