On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Clojure's getting better all the time at implementing Java-like things > without dropping down to Java. But the whole point of programming Clojure > is to be "more functional", using and creating persistent data structures > that work well with its STM. Coding an imperative, mutable BST in Clojure > isn't going to be its strong suit. > In fact it'll probably just be discouraging. > I recommend reading Okasaki's Purely Functional Data Structures to build a > better understanding of what kind of data structures you'd want to create in > Clojure (if you need something beyond the built-ins), and how to implement > them. +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
