I wouldn't worry too much about your reputation. Your posts are top
notch, and you obviously know the language better than 90% of most
clojure users. Have confidence and laugh if you think someone is
disparaging: actions speak far louder than words.



On Dec 14, 4:42 am, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:52 AM, James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com> wrote:
> > On 14 December 2010 09:22, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
>
> >> Am 13.12.2010 um 23:52 schrieb Ken Wesson:
>
> >>> That's not what I meant. I figure all of us have tabs permanently open
> >>> to there (I have two actually). What we don't have is the whole thing
> >>> memorized, or the time to read it all rather than use it for reference […]
>
> >> My solution to this problem is actually quite simple: I took the time to 
> >> read it.
>
> > One can also apply a measure of common sense.
>
> I resent the implication that I didn't.
>
> > If you're writing a function that has a general use, such as changing
> > the metadata, you may very well consider the possibility it has already
> > been written. If you then open the API page and search for a function
> > that contains "meta", you'd soon run across vary-meta.
>
> Yes, but if you look for functions that work on atoms you won't, and
> someone looking for functionality like swap-meta! is at least as
> likely to think "atoms" as "metadata" when formulating a search.
>
> I don't think there's any point in endlessly rehashing this and trying
> to point a finger of blame. Nobody has actually done anything wrong
> here, as near as I can tell, OTHER than trying to turn this into a
> blame game by getting critical.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to