Thanks Alan, I have in fact realized the mistake after I posted it .. and I had posted another message which has it the way you mentioned. Sunil.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote: > I see you have defined a print-and-return macro; you might prefer my > and-print: > > (defmacro and-print > "A useful debugging tool when you can't figure out what's going on: > wrap a form with and-print, and the form will be printed alongside > its result. The result will still be passed along." > [val] > `(let [x# ~val] > (println '~val "is" x#) > x#)) > > I'm not sure what you're using the flag argument for; if it's to keep > track of what prints belong to what statements then my automatic > printing of the input form might be useful for you. > > I'd pull the (repeat blah blah blah) stuff in with-separator out into > an optional argument, so that (a) you only have to write it once, and > (b) you can use a different separator easily. > > I find the map in local-bindings pretty hard to read - what on earth > is `'~x# for? Without trying to understand what you're doing, it seems > like you could gain readability by replacing (list 'println [`'~x# > x#]) with `(println ['~x# x#]) > > On Nov 28, 12:32 am, Sunil S Nandihalli <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > What I had posted before was half-baked buggy code .. the following gist > > has a few more helper debug macroshttps://gist.github.com/718725 > > > > <https://gist.github.com/718725>This code was written when I was trying > to > > learn writing macros .. so any criticism is very welcome. > > Thanks > > Sunil. > > > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Robert McIntyre <r...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > cool! Although I think with-seperator should be spelled > "with-separator" > > > > > --Robert McIntyre > > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Sunil S Nandihalli > > > <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I just tried to re-write with-seperator without using the > symbol-macros > > > from > > > > macro-utils and it seems to work fine .. > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Sunil S Nandihalli > > > > <sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Hello everybody, > > > >> I was trying to learn to write clojure macros and the code is > posted > > > here > > > >> in the following link > > > >>https://gist.github.com/715047 > > > >> There are basically three macros > > > >> 1. with-seperator - a zero argument macro and is supposed to just > draw a > > > >> line to indicate beginning and ending of the execution of the body. > > > >> 2. display-local-bindings - a function to print the local bindings > in > > > the > > > >> lexical scope where the macro is called > > > >> 3. letd - a helper macro to print the values of all the bindings > > > followed > > > >> by printing of the local bindings using display-local-bindings > > > >> The letd macro as posted works as expected but without the > seperation > > > line > > > >> . It is supposed to print the seperation line when I uncomment line > 14 > > > and > > > >> comment line 15 but some how this is causing the &env variable > > > automatically > > > >> passed with every macro to be nil display-local-binding .. but the I > > > feel it > > > >> is not the case .. can somebody help me understand this. This was an > > > >> exercise to learn macro writing than to writing a letd debugging > helper > > > >> function.. > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Sunil. > > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > with > > > your > > > > first post. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > <clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > > your first post. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > <clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
