Hi, Am 06.12.2010 um 22:38 schrieb Ken Wesson:
> A reduce that discards one of its arguments (e.g. (reduce (fn [n _] > (inc n)) coll)) also strikes me as slightly icky. :) Indeed this would fit in the 5% left. Anyway: I can't remember writing a function with accumulator not using the other argument in production code. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
