Yes,
though I've always found 'into a little bit too magical for me.
For example, I find it hard to follow the doc to see what 'adding' will mean
for maps.
2010/12/3 George Jahad <cloj...@blackbirdsystems.net>
>
> > (apply
> > merge-with
> > conj
> > {}
> > (for [nd d nd-pair nd face nd-pair]
> > {face nd}))
>
> I like to use into for cases like this:
>
> (into {} (for [nd d nd-pair nd face nd-pair] [face nd]))
>
>
> seems clearer to me.
>
> g
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
