Right now I am just seq ing it before using nth
Sunil.

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Sunil S Nandihalli <
sunil.nandiha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>  I am thinking it would be nice to have nth work for sorted-set and
> sorted-maps .. IMHO it makes at the least sense for sorted-set if not both
> .. is there a reason why this is not implemented already?
> Thanks,
> Sunil.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to