thanks Miki .. I guess using hash is even better .. I overlooked it the first time I read your reply .. Sunil
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:48 PM, David Powell <djpow...@djpowell.net>wrote: > > > On Tue 23/11/10 09:41 , Sunil S Nandihalli sunil.nandiha...@gmail.comsent: > > Hello everybody, It is really nice that all the > > clojure-datastructures have a function called hashCode.. I saw it gave > > the same answer for the same native map/vector/set/list give the same > > number ... is it meant to be used by the end-user of clojure if so > > what things can we assume about them? This is just out of curiosity > > ... I don't have a use-case for this (yet).ThanksSunil. > > Note that the built in function 'hash' will have roughly the same effect as > calling .hashCode - and that is definitely part of the API. > > -- > Dave > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
