I ran into this while working on making functions durable. Here's a
contrived example:
=> (defn a
([x] x)
([x y] (+ (a x) (a y))))
#'user/a
=> (a 1 2)
3
=> (def b a)
#'user/b
=> (b 1 2)
3
=> (defn a [x]
(- x))
#'user/a
=> (b 1 2)
-3
Is this what people expect? I would think that the original
definition of a, which is self-referencing, should point to itself no
matter what it's named, not get resolved at invoke-time to see what
the var is currently resolving to.
Thanks,
Alyssa Kwan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
