On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Robert McIntyre <r...@mit.edu> wrote:
> That is not in fact an adequate workaround --- > > (eval `(apply + ~@(take 9001 (iterate inc 1)))) ;; OVER 9000!!! > > or, alternately > > (eval (cons 'apply (cons '+ (take 9001 (iterate inc 1))))) > > will fail just as in the addition examples. > > It's not true that you can just use an apply in your auto generated > code, you would instead have to do something like a tree of function > calls, so It may be worth increasing the limit for for the sake of > enabling machine generated code. > > What are you peoples' thoughts on this? > > --Robert McIntyre Not worth getting worked up. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
