On Nov 10, 11:20 pm, "Eric Schulte" <schulte.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Inspired by cgrand's regexp example [1], I've implemented a simple DSL > for specifying neural networks using Clojure data types.
This is really clear. The web page documentation is awesome. > Construction of this simple language involved a number of choices as to > where to place complexity (into the DSL or into user land), generally I > erred on the side of leaving complexity out of the DSL resulting in > potentially more complex usage, but in increased generality. I'd love > to hear any feedback on how this could be improved, simplified, or made > more idiomatic. > Its probably not a direction you want to go in, but when using a Lisp to specify the network architecture it opens up the possibility of using genetic programming to design a network to fit a particular problem. The map format doesn't fit this but, because you use protocols in the implementation, a list format for the DSL would allow genetic programming. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.100.4432 Obviously though, their DSL is nowhere as clear and clean as yours. Saul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
