I'd hoist the empty out of the cond using an if:

(if (empty? ps)
    ret
    (let [fps (first (first ps))]
        (cond
            ...)))


On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:49 PM, andrei <andrei.zhabin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a code similar to this:
>
> (def pairs (list [1 :a] [2 :b] [3 :c]))
> ...
> (loop [ps pairs, ret {}]
>    (cond (empty? ps) ret
>             (some-test (first (first ps))) (recur (rest ps) (add-to-
> result ret (first (first ps))))
>             :true (recur (rest ps) (do-smth-else ret (first (first
> ps))))))
>
> You can see that string (first (first ps)), which actually gets first
> element of a first vector in pairs, occur many times. I can't move it
> before cond, since ps may be empty and evaluating of (first (first
> ps)) will produce an error (ok, it won't, but in general case it may).
> Is there another way to simplify code to not repeat one form several
> times?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en



-- 
http://www.apgwoz.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to