IMHO if it is not broken, dont fix it. I am sure the original authors are aware and are very much around. Probably they would be the best people to do it anyway.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:43 AM, David Jacobs < develo...@allthingsprogress.com> wrote: > I've just started learning Clojure and I'm excited about what I see. The > combination of power and sophistication in the language is refreshing, and > I've started to dive into the source code to understand it better. > > One meta-observation has come out of my scouring. > > The indentation used for the part of Clojure that's written in Clojure is > beautifully indented, well documented, and generally easy to work through. > On the other hand, the Java source doesn't look so consistent, either > internally or with standard practices--especially as regards whitespace, > indentation, and braces. > > It may seem like a small thing, but I think that having well-formatted, > consistent source code is important. > > Would there be any objection to reformatting the Java source to make it > consistent? I wouldn't mind undertaking that project in my free time. > > Thoughts? > > David > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- http://hi.im/santosh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en