IMHO if it is not broken, dont fix it. I am sure the original authors are
aware and are very much around. Probably they would be the best people to do
it anyway.

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:43 AM, David Jacobs <
develo...@allthingsprogress.com> wrote:

> I've just started learning Clojure and I'm excited about what I see. The
> combination of power and sophistication in the language is refreshing, and
> I've started to dive into the source code to understand it better.
>
> One meta-observation has come out of my scouring.
>
> The indentation used for the part of Clojure that's written in Clojure is
> beautifully indented, well documented, and generally easy to work through.
> On the other hand, the Java source doesn't look so consistent, either
> internally or with standard practices--especially as regards whitespace,
> indentation, and braces.
>
> It may seem like a small thing, but I think that having well-formatted,
> consistent source code is important.
>
> Would there be any objection to reformatting the Java source to make it
> consistent? I wouldn't mind undertaking that project in my free time.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> David
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en




-- 
http://hi.im/santosh

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to