Well, taking a brief look over your code, it seems like the main difference is that scriptjure is macro-based, so all the code generation gets done at compile-time.
That makes scriptjure faster, but at the expense of needing an unquote form - "(clj ...)" - to splice clojure expressions into the javascript source sexps. -Steve jim <jim.d...@gmail.com> writes: > I've heard of scriptjure but never used it or looked at it. My > interests took me in another direction and I've never circled back. I > would be interested to know how the differ. > > Thanks, > Jim > > On Oct 11, 3:21 am, Steve Purcell <st...@sanityinc.com> wrote: >> jim <jim.d...@gmail.com> writes: >> > Due to popular demand*, I resuscitated my code to generate javascript >> > from s-expressions. This was what I coded to learn about logic >> > programming in Clojure. >> >> > Github:http://github.com/jduey/js-gen >> > Clojars:http://clojars.org/net.intensivesystems/js-gen >> >> > *actually it was just one person, but I'm easily swayed. >> >> Neat! You've seen Scriptjure, I expect, so it'd be interesting to hear >> how your library differs: >> >> http://github.com/arohner/scriptjure >> >> -Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
