On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Lee Spector <lspec...@hampshire.edu> wrote:
> > Although this isn't yet making any real sense to me I believe I MAY have > traced an elusive problem in code that I ported from clojure 1.1 to 1.2 to > the way in which big integers are handled in 1.2. I've seen (and > participated in) some conversations about handling bignums but I don't > recall what particular changes were slated to happen in the change from 1.1 > to 1.2 or to 1.3-in-progress -- can someone point me to a summary? > The numerics changes did not make into 1.2. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
