I just submitted a patch for this issue. On Oct 1, 2:42 pm, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm working on the latter right now. Note there's already a ticket > for the reflection problem:https://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure/tickets/446 > > On Oct 1, 12:24 pm, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > David pointed out what should have been the obvious overhead (I'll > > > blame it on being up at 2am), and Nicolas pointed out the specific > > > problem. > > > two solutions: > > > - writing all combinations of unboxed/boxed for every function > > - having a more clever code generator that try to box every > > primitive if it allows to prevent a reflective call. > > (And maybe emit a "boxing warning")
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
