There it is : http://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/Compiler.java#L5984
The magic only happen for dos which are top level forms 2010/9/30 Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The following form fails in Clojure 1.0, but was fixed in 1.1: > >> > >> (eval '(do (require 'clojure.inspector) clojure.inspector/inspect)) > > > > Yes, "do" is given special treatment, I've meet this part of code a while > > back. It basically just is converted into as many eval() as there are > exprs > > in the do. > > Fascinating; thanks. > > It's a shame that forms with implicit "do" don't get treated > similarly, but I suppose that's a sidetrack for which it would be very > difficult to get all the edge cases for very little gain. > > (eval '(when true (require 'clojure.inspector) > clojure.inspector/inspect)) > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > clojure.inspector (core.clj:6) > > -Phil > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
