Hi, On 21 Sep., 09:39, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So (= m1 m2) may not imply (= (zipmap (keys m1) (vals m1)) (zipmap (keys m2) > (vals m2))) for any (m1, m2), hmmm, good to remember somewhere in my head > ... :) I don't think that this is the case. What is meant, is (= (keys m1) (keys m2)) is not necessarily true although maybe (= m1 m2). Eg.: user=> (def m (array-map :a 1 :b 2 :c 3 :d 4 :e 5 :f 6 :g 7 :h 8 :i 9)) #'user/m user=> (def n (assoc m :j 10)) #'user/n user=> (= m (dissoc n :j)) true user=> (= (keys m) (keys (dissoc n :j))) false However, your zipmap's above will always work, because the keys and vals refer to the same map instance. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
