Yeah this doesn't happen on using lazy-seq. Thanks! Shantanu
On Sep 20, 8:52 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <squee...@mac.com> wrote: > On Sep 19, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Shantanu Kumar wrote: > > > I simulated a similar recursive call and found it > > throws StackOverflowError at 5508 levels deep on a 32-bit Sun JVM (not > > server mode) on Windows 7. > > Did your similar recursion include the lazy-seq form that wraps the > (apparently) recursive call? Each invocation of lazy-seq results in one call > to the code it wraps that's delayed until its value is requested. The > invocations do not end up nested on the stack. Instead they are executed one > by one as calling code steps through the lazy sequence. > > --Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
