I seem to recall that 1.2 is using "chunked" lazy sequences for performance reasons, and fib is a lazy sequence. I wonder if you'd start seeing intermediate steps using (fib 20) instead of (fib 3)?
m On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Scott Jaderholm <jaderh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why does c.c.trace give different output on 1.2 than it did on 1.1? > > From > http://learnclojure.blogspot.com/2010/02/slime-2009-10-31-user-defn-fib-n-if-n-2.html > > On 1.1 > > user> (dotrace (fib) (fib 3)) > > TRACE t1880: (fib 3) > TRACE t1881: | (fib 2) > TRACE t1882: | | (fib 1) > TRACE t1882: | | => 1 > TRACE t1883: | | (fib 0) > TRACE t1883: | | => 0 > TRACE t1881: | => 1 > TRACE t1884: | (fib 1) > TRACE t1884: | => 1 > TRACE t1880: => 2 > 2 > user> > > On 1.2 > > user> dotrace (fib) (fib 3)) > > TRACE t11624: (fib 3) > TRACE t11624: => 2 > > Thanks, > Scott > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
