There are some performance numbers on different serialization libraries here: http://wiki.github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/
Jackson is a Java JSON library and it seems to do pretty well in those benchmarks. On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 22:01, Michael Ossareh <ossa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 19:50, Wilson MacGyver <wmacgy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I figure enough time has passed that I want to bring this up again. >> >> For JSON, are you using clojure.contrib.json or clj-json? Why? > > > We use org.danlarkin.json, because it encodes and decodes (contrib.json > didn't when we made our decision) and it was the first hit in the google > listings for "clojure json". > > If anyone gets around to doing some real world perf analysis and there is a > significant winner then we may switch. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, Christian Vest Hansen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
