Yes, thats what I see. I just dont think this is very sensible. Thank you Meikel!
Greetings, alux On 3 Sep., 13:10, Meikel Brandmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 3 Sep., 12:49, alux <[email protected]> wrote: > > > shouldnt the type x be listed a extender of xx here? Or why not? > > No. It shows up if you actually use extend to the extend the protocol > to the type. > > Sincerely > Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
