On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:43 PM, tsuraan <tsur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In this situation, inlining (int 10) does not buy much. > > interesting; for me replacing the 10 with (int 10) brings my times > from 28.7ms to 19.6ms.
I meant putting (int 10) instead of nl and a let. Anyway, it seems that we can get to java speed, but with some hard work. I have read somewhere than 1.3 will help a lot to achieve this performance with less work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
